This is a specific conversation about Pet DNA tests — what they can and can't tell you — ask about yours and get one honest answer for your exact situation.
inparticular.ai
A failed swab is genuinely frustrating — especially when the result comes back as 'excluded with 100% certainty' rather than just inconclusive, which means the lab got nothing usable to work with at all. The good news is it's almost always a sampling issue, not a problem with your dog, and it's entirely fixable with the right kit and technique. Before I point you in the right direction: is your main interest in breed breakdown, health screening, or both? And just to confirm — your dog is a mixed breed with an unknown or uncertain background?
Yeah, she's 4 years old and we got her from a rescue so no history at all. We're interested in both the breed stuff and health screening. The previous test we tried just came back saying the sample was unusable. Really annoying.
inparticular.ai
Completely understandable — you did everything right and still got nothing back. The most common cause of a failed swab is either not swabbing for long enough, the dog having eaten or drunk recently, or saliva contaminating the cheek cells. Some kits also have less forgiving collection windows than others. Given that you want both breed and health results, and you've already had one failure, I'd point you specifically toward Embark rather than a cheaper option. Can I ask — when you did the previous test, do you remember roughly how long you swabbed for, and had she eaten beforehand?
Honestly I'm not sure we swabbed for long enough — the instructions weren't very clear and I think she might have had water not long before. We probably rushed it a bit.
inparticular.ai
That's almost certainly what happened — water before swabbing dilutes the cell sample significantly, and rushing the swab is the other main culprit. Embark's instructions are notably clearer than most competitors on exactly this: they specify a two-hour fast beforehand and a firm 30-second swab on each cheek. The kit itself also uses a slightly more robust swab design that picks up cells more reliably. On the results side, Embark is the strongest option on the market for a dog with an unknown background — they test against over 350 breeds and have the largest reference database, so mixed breeds with unusual combinations get properly identified rather than lumped into vague categories. The health panel covers over 250 genetic conditions and is genuinely clinically graded, which matters if you're using it to have an informed conversation with your vet. It's not cheap at around £129, but given you've already spent money on a test that failed, buying the most reliable kit available makes sense.
That sounds good. Is there anything specific I should do differently this time to make sure the sample is good?
inparticular.ai
Yes — a few things that genuinely make a difference. Keep her away from food, water, and chews for at least two hours before you swab. When you do swab, press the brush firmly against the inside of the cheek and gum line — not just the tongue — and rotate it for a full 30 seconds per cheek, which feels longer than you'd expect. Don't let her lick the swab or get saliva on the outside of the tube before you seal it. Register the kit online before you post it back, because Embark tracks samples and will contact you if there's any concern about the sample quality before processing — which is a useful safety net. Do all that and a failed sample would be genuinely unusual.
Perfect, that's really helpful. I'll go with Embark then.
inparticular.ai
Good call. The Embark Breed + Health kit is the one to get — it covers everything in a single test so you won't need to buy a separate health panel later. Given your rescue background with no history, the health results in particular could be really valuable for your vet to have on file. Hope you finally get the answers you were after — she sounds like a lucky dog to have someone this determined to find out her story.